Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Ledford v. State

Ledford v. State

155 S.E. 772, 42 Ga. App. 289, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 358
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 11, 1930·No. 20862·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial is based on the general grounds only. There is evidence to support the finding of the jury; - and this court can not interfere with the judgment of the trial court overruling the motion. Soell v. State, 4 Ga. App. 337 (3) (61 S. E. 514); Kirkland v. State, 39 Ga. App. 568 (147 S. E. 777); Cothren v. State, 38 Ga. App. 752 (145 S. E. 484).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ledford v. State, 155 S.E. 772, 42 Ga. App. 289, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 358 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

155 S.E. 772 (Ledford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Soell v. State
61 S.E. 514 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Cothren v. State
145 S.E. 484 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Cothren v. State
145 S.E. 484 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Kirkland v. State
147 S.E. 777 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)