Ledford v. State

623 So. 2d 818, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8901, 1993 WL 331403
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ledford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 652 So. 2d 1254
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 1, 1993·No. No. 92-0909·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole point meriting discussion is the defendant’s sentence. The sentence imposed in the present case exceeded those set out in the guidelines because the trial court considered the juvenile’s record. Under Puffinberger v. State, 581 So.2d 897 (Fla.1991), an unscored juvenile record is considered for departure purposes only if the record is significant or serious, or if the number and the nature of the dispositions when considered in combination amounts to a significant record. We conclude, after reviewing this defendant’s juvenile record, that his record does not constitute a significant record and should not have been considered.

We reverse and remand for resentencing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

[819]*819ANSTEAD and KLEIN, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ledford v. State, 623 So. 2d 818, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8901, 1993 WL 331403 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

623 So. 2d 818 (Ledford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Puffinberger v. State
581 So. 2d 897 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)