Ledford v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

386 S.E.2d 662, 259 Ga. 560, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 459
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 9, 1989
Docket46674
StatusPublished

This text of 386 S.E.2d 662 (Ledford v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ledford v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 386 S.E.2d 662, 259 Ga. 560, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 459 (Ga. 1989).

Opinion

Bell, Justice.

We granted certiorari to consider whether the opinion of the Court of Appeals, Ledford v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 189 Ga. App. 866 (377 SE2d 693) (1989), was in conflict with the opinion of the Court of Appeals in Brown v. Phillips, 178 Ga. App. 316 (1) (342 SE2d 786) (1986), regarding application of the doctrine of in loco parentis.

After careful consideration, we conclude that the two opinions are not in conflict, and hereby affirm the judgment in Ledford.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Phillips
342 S.E.2d 786 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Ledford v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
377 S.E.2d 693 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
386 S.E.2d 662, 259 Ga. 560, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ledford-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-ga-1989.