Ledford v. New Orleans Saints

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Ledford v. New Orleans Saints

19 So. 3d 466, 2009 La. LEXIS 3023

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 16, 2009

DocketNo. 2009-C-1492

StatusPublished

This text of 19 So. 3d 466 (Ledford v. New Orleans Saints) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ledford v. New Orleans Saints, 19 So. 3d 466, 2009 La. LEXIS 3023 (La. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Ledford, Dwayne; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Workers’ Compensation, District 8, Nos. 06-08246, 06-08248, 07-00631; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2008-CA-1307.

Writ granted in part and denied in part. Relator sought relief from adverse rulings below on his workers’ compensation claim. Upon review, we find merit only in Relator’s contention that he was erroneously denied reimbursement for expenses related to the removal of screws from his finger as necessary treatment of his work related injury. La. R.S. 23:1203. The case is remanded to the office of workers’ compensation for a determination of the amount due and reconsideration of Relator’s claim for penalties and attorney fees in view of this ruling. In all other respects, the writ application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ledford, Dwayne; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Workers’ Compensation, District 8, Nos. 06-08246, 06-08248, 07-00631; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2008-CA-1307.

Writ granted in part and denied in part. Relator sought relief from adverse rulings below on his workers’ compensation claim. Upon review, we find merit only in Relator’s contention that he was erroneously denied reimbursement for expenses related to the removal of screws from his finger as necessary treatment of his work related injury. La. R.S. 23:1203. The case is remanded to the office of workers’ compensation for a determination of the amount due and reconsideration of Relator’s claim for penalties and attorney fees in view of this ruling. In all other respects, the writ application is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 So. 3d 466, 2009 La. LEXIS 3023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ledford-v-new-orleans-saints-la-2009.