Ledford v. Engle

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Ledford v. Engle

761 So. 2d 995, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 184, 2000 WL 283886

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedMarch 17, 2000

Docket2971041

StatusPublished

This text of 761 So. 2d 995 (Ledford v. Engle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ledford v. Engle, 761 So. 2d 995, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 184, 2000 WL 283886 (Ala. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

After Remand from■ the Supreme Court

YATES, Judge.

This court, on March 12, 1999, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. Ledford v. Engle, (No. 2971041) — So.2d - (Ala.Civ.App.1999) (table). The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed this court’s judgment insofar as it affirmed the summary judgment on the claim relating [996]*996to the validity of the agreements to compensate Engle, and the case has been remanded to this court. Ex parte Ledford, 761 So.2d 990 (Ala.2000). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court as to the aforesaid claim is reversed and the case is remanded. The trial court is directed to determine what portion, if any, of the $35,700 constituted fees or other payment for those services mentioned in § 34-27-30, Ala.Code 1975, services for which En-gle could not legally charge.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and MONROE, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from■ the Supreme Court

YATES, Judge.

This court, on March 12, 1999, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. Ledford v. Engle, (No. 2971041) — So.2d - (Ala.Civ.App.1999) (table). The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed this court’s judgment insofar as it affirmed the summary judgment on the claim relating [996]*996to the validity of the agreements to compensate Engle, and the case has been remanded to this court. Ex parte Ledford, 761 So.2d 990 (Ala.2000). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court as to the aforesaid claim is reversed and the case is remanded. The trial court is directed to determine what portion, if any, of the $35,700 constituted fees or other payment for those services mentioned in § 34-27-30, Ala.Code 1975, services for which En-gle could not legally charge.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and MONROE, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

761 So. 2d 995, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 184, 2000 WL 283886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ledford-v-engle-alacivapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack