Ledford v. Department of Transportation

324 S.E.2d 470, 253 Ga. 717, 1985 Ga. LEXIS 786
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 9, 1985
Docket41506
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 324 S.E.2d 470 (Ledford v. Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ledford v. Department of Transportation, 324 S.E.2d 470, 253 Ga. 717, 1985 Ga. LEXIS 786 (Ga. 1985).

Opinion

Marshall, Presiding Justice.

The plaintiffs filed a complaint for declaratory judgment to have declared unconstitutional Rule 672-6-.05 (d), which was promulgated by the defendant and which regulates the maintenancé of “nonconforming,” outdoor advertising signs. As to “nonconforming” signs, see OCGA § 32-6-71 (12).

The complaint was filed after the plaintiffs had been served with a notice of administrative hearing concerning the enforcement of this rule. The plaintiffs sought to have the superior court enjoin the administrative hearing. However, the complaint was dismissed by the superior court. The plaintiffs appeal. Held: We affirm.

George v. Dept. of Natural Resources, 250 Ga. 491 (299 SE2d 556) (1983), holds that Georgia courts will not enjoin administrative proceedings in progress or grant declaratory relief concerning a constitutional question which could be raised on appeal from the administrative decision. We hold that the administrative hearing came to be “in progress” within the meaning of George v. Dept. of Natural Resources, supra, when the plaintiffs were served with a notice of the hearing. OCGA § 50-13-10 is inapplicable here, as in George, because in their complaint the plaintiffs attack the constitutionality of the statute pursuant to which the DOT rule was promulgated, as well as the rule itself. See OCGA § 32-6-79.

Therefore, the superior court did not err in dismissing the complaint.

Judgment affirmed.

Hill, C. J., Marshall, P. J., Clarke, Smith, *718 Weltner, and Bell, JJ., and Judge James E. Findley concur. Gregory, J., disqualified. Decided January 9, 1985 Rehearing denied January 23, 1985. Sims & Fleming, John S. Sims, Jr., Alan H. Swan, Powell, Gold-stein, Frazer & Murphy, Frank Love, Jr., Jeffrey W. Kelley, for appellants. David, Pridgen & Jones, John C. Pridgen, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, William C. Joy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES v. ADDISON
304 Ga. 425 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
Ga. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Addison
819 S.E.2d 20 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
Wallace v. State Bar
486 S.E.2d 165 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1997)
Miller v. Georgia Department of Public Safety
453 S.E.2d 725 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1995)
State Health Planning Agency v. Coastal Empire Rehabilitation Hospital
412 S.E.2d 532 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1992)
City of Waycross v. Reid Rental Co.
367 S.E.2d 305 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Higginbotham v. Holliday Construction Co.
357 S.E.2d 319 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Higgins v. Department of Public Safety
347 S.E.2d 562 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
324 S.E.2d 470, 253 Ga. 717, 1985 Ga. LEXIS 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ledford-v-department-of-transportation-ga-1985.