Lederle v. Spivey

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Lederle v. Spivey

171 A.3d 1050, 327 Conn. 954

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 2, 2017·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 174 Conn.App. 592, 166 A.3d 636 (2017), is granted, limited to the following question:

"Did the Appellate Court properly apply the abuse of discretion standard of review in holding that the trial court's memorandum of decision lacked 'factual findings with a high degree of specificity' when the trial court found that the defendant's claims on appeal lacked any indicia of color?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 174 Conn.App. 592, 166 A.3d 636 (2017), is granted, limited to the following question:

"Did the Appellate Court properly apply the abuse of discretion standard of review in holding that the trial court's memorandum of decision lacked 'factual findings with a high degree of specificity' when the trial court found that the defendant's claims on appeal lacked any indicia of color?"

Lederle v. Spivey, 171 A.3d 1050, 327 Conn. 954 (Colo. 2017).

Pincite

171 A.3d 1050 (Lederle v. Spivey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related