Lederle v. Spivey

171 A.3d 1050, 327 Conn. 954
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 2, 2017
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 171 A.3d 1050 (Lederle v. Spivey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lederle v. Spivey, 171 A.3d 1050, 327 Conn. 954 (Colo. 2017).

Opinion

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 174 Conn.App. 592, 166 A.3d 636 (2017), is granted, limited to the following question:

"Did the Appellate Court properly apply the abuse of discretion standard of review in holding that the trial court's memorandum of decision lacked 'factual findings with a high degree of specificity' when the trial court found that the defendant's claims on appeal lacked any indicia of color?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lederle v. Spivey
213 A.3d 481 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 A.3d 1050, 327 Conn. 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lederle-v-spivey-conn-2017.