Lederer v. Yule
63 A. 1118, 67 N.J. Eq. 728, 1 Robb. 728, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 222
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, reported ante p. 65.
For affirmance — Poet, Pitney, Veedenbuegh, (>Veoom, Gbeen, Gbay — 6.
For reversal — Dixon, Gaebison, Bogeet — 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lederer v. Yule, 63 A. 1118, 67 N.J. Eq. 728, 1 Robb. 728, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 222 (N.J. 1904).
63 A. 1118 (Lederer v. Yule) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.