Lederer v. Krausz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lederer v. Krausz

90 N.Y.S. 402

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1904

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 90 N.Y.S. 402 (Lederer v. Krausz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lederer v. Krausz, 90 N.Y.S. 402 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No affidavits or other papers were submitted in the court below by plaintiff upon this motion. In the absence of proof authorizing the court, in the exercise of a sound discretion, to deny defendants’ motion, the defendants, according to uniform practice, were entitled, upon the verified allegations contained in [403]*403their moving papers, to the stay asked for. Barton v. Speis, 73 N. Y. 133; Richardson v. White, 27 How. Prac. 153.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

No affidavits or other papers were submitted in the court below by plaintiff upon this motion. In the absence of proof authorizing the court, in the exercise of a sound discretion, to deny defendants’ motion, the defendants, according to uniform practice, were entitled, upon the verified allegations contained in [403]*403their moving papers, to the stay asked for. Barton v. Speis, 73 N. Y. 133; Richardson v. White, 27 How. Prac. 153.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 N.Y.S. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lederer-v-krausz-nyappterm-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack