Lederer v. Krausz
90 N.Y.S. 402
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 10, 1904·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
No affidavits or other papers were submitted in the court below by plaintiff upon this motion. In the absence of proof authorizing the court, in the exercise of a sound discretion, to deny defendants’ motion, the defendants, according to uniform practice, were entitled, upon the verified allegations contained in [403] their moving papers, to the stay asked for. Barton v. Speis, 73 N. Y. 133; Richardson v. White, 27 How. Prac. 153.
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lederer v. Krausz, 90 N.Y.S. 402 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).
90 N.Y.S. 402 (Lederer v. Krausz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Kohn v. Manton
11 Ohio App. 364 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1919)