Lederer v. Ehrenfeld

The Superior Court of New York City

Lederer v. Ehrenfeld

49 How. Pr. 403, 1875 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 74

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedSeptember 24, 1875

StatusPublished

This text of 49 How. Pr. 403 (Lederer v. Ehrenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lederer v. Ehrenfeld, 49 How. Pr. 403, 1875 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 74 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

Van Vorst, J.

By order of March 30, 1872, the judgment was ordered to be entered against the plaintiff personally, and it was accordingly so entered. The plaintiff, Samuel Lederer, jr., is the judgment debtor. ■ The proceedings under section 292 of the Code, are authorized when the execution against the property of the judgment debtor is returned unsatisfied.

This step having been taken the supplementary proceedings are regular.

The regularity of the judgment cannot be questioned in this proceeding.

In Grantman agt. Thrall (31 How., 464), it is suggested that the reasonable and better practice is to issue the execution against the infant in the first instance, before proceeding ' against the guardian. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Vorst, J.

By order of March 30, 1872, the judgment was ordered to be entered against the plaintiff personally, and it was accordingly so entered. The plaintiff, Samuel Lederer, jr., is the judgment debtor. ■ The proceedings under section 292 of the Code, are authorized when the execution against the property of the judgment debtor is returned unsatisfied.

This step having been taken the supplementary proceedings are regular.

The regularity of the judgment cannot be questioned in this proceeding.

In Grantman agt. Thrall (31 How., 464), it is suggested that the reasonable and better practice is to issue the execution against the infant in the first instance, before proceeding ' against the guardian. Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 How. Pr. 403, 1875 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lederer-v-ehrenfeld-nysuperctnyc-1875.