Leder v. Skaletsky
212 A.D. 829
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1925
StatusPublished
This text of 212 A.D. 829 (Leder v. Skaletsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Leder v. Skaletsky, 212 A.D. 829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).
Opinion
Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs, on the ground that the defense of usury is personal to the borrower (Terminal Bank v. Dubroff, 66 Misc. 100), and is not available to the respondent. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Terminal Bank v. Dubroff
66 Misc. 100 (New York Supreme Court, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
212 A.D. 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leder-v-skaletsky-nyappdiv-1925.