Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Leder v. Skaletsky

Leder v. Skaletsky

212 A.D. 829
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1925·Published

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs, on the ground that the defense of usury is personal to the borrower (Terminal Bank v. Dubroff, 66 Misc. 100), and is not available to the respondent. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leder v. Skaletsky, 212 A.D. 829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

212 A.D. 829 (Leder v. Skaletsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terminal Bank v. Dubroff
66 Misc. 100 (New York Supreme Court, 1910)