Ledent v. State of Florida
This text of Ledent v. State of Florida (Ledent v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-2476 _____________________________
DEMARCUS R. LEDENT,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John F. Simon, Judge.
March 12, 2025
PER CURIAM.
An untimely motion for rehearing does not toll rendition of the underlying order. See Floyd v. State, 893 So. 2d 588, 589 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (“Because neither the letter nor the subsequently filed motion for rehearing was timely, the time for filing the notice of appeal was not tolled.”). We dismiss the untimely appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
BILBREY, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Demarcus R. Ledent, pro se, Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ledent v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ledent-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.