Ledbetter v. Winchel

40 N.E. 1065, 142 Ind. 109, 1895 Ind. LEXIS 141
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 5, 1895
DocketNo. 17,457
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 40 N.E. 1065 (Ledbetter v. Winchel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ledbetter v. Winchel, 40 N.E. 1065, 142 Ind. 109, 1895 Ind. LEXIS 141 (Ind. 1895).

Opinion

McCabe, C. J.

The appellee Winchel sued the appellants and her co-appellee, Samuel Moore, to foreclose a mortgage on certain described real estate in Grant county. Moore was defaulted. He was made a defendant because it was alleged he held a judgment lien on the mortgaged premises junior to that of the plaintiff’s mortgage.

The only answer filed by appellants was a plea in [110]*110abatement, the issues formed upon which were tried by the court, resulting in a finding thereon against appellants, and they failing to plead over, there was a decree of foreclosure against all the defendants, including Moore. It is assigned for error that the trial court overruled appellants’demurrer to the complaint, overruled their motion for a new trial, and their motion to modify the decree. Moore, one of the defendants against whom the decree is rendered, is made an appellee and not a co-appellant with the appellant.

Filed June 5, 1895 ; petition to reinstate overruled September 24, 1895.

He was entitled to appeal from the judgment, and being a co-party to the judgment with the appellants he should have been joined as a co-appellant with them, and notice served on him as such which is an unofficial notice. Burns R. S. 1894, section 644, R. S. 1881, section 635; Gregory v. Smith, 139 Ind. 48; Wood v. Clites, 140 Ind. 472; Benbow v. Garrard, 139 Ind. 571. No such notice was served on him.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw v. Garrett
108 N.E. 536 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1915)
Souers v. Walter
99 N.E. 1002 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1912)
Belk v. Fossler
85 N.E. 990 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1908)
Holderman v. Wood
73 N.E. 199 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1905)
Burns v. Trustees of Huntertown Cemetery Church
68 N.E. 915 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1903)
Smith v. Fairfield
61 N.E. 560 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1901)
Perry v. Botkin
42 N.E. 964 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1896)
Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. George
42 N.E. 245 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 N.E. 1065, 142 Ind. 109, 1895 Ind. LEXIS 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ledbetter-v-winchel-ind-1895.