Ledbetter v. M. B. Foster Electric Co.

260 N.E.2d 174, 357 Mass. 780
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJune 9, 1970
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 260 N.E.2d 174 (Ledbetter v. M. B. Foster Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ledbetter v. M. B. Foster Electric Co., 260 N.E.2d 174, 357 Mass. 780 (Mass. 1970).

Opinion

In this action of tort the plaintiff claims for personal injuries received in a flash fire caused by the malfunction of a grill in the Jordan Marsh Company store in Boston, stating that the defendant undertook to repair the grill and its wiring system and did so negligently. We do not discuss the issues of negligence and the defence raised under G. L. c. 152, §§15 and 18, for the matter can be disposed of on the defendant’s contention that the individuals who undertook the repairs were lent servants to Jordan Marsh Company. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff (Cannon v. Crowley, 318 Mass 373, 374), it could have been found that the individuals who did the electrical work were employees of the defendant and paid by it although they worked steadily at Jordan Marsh Company. The two individual electricians took orders directly from the defendant’s foreman but the foreman in turn took his orders directly from an electrician in the employ of Jordan Marsh Company. In this instance the employees did not continue liable to the direction and control of the defendant but were subject to that of Jordan Marsh Company to which they were lent. Galloway’s Case, 354 Mass. 427, 430. See Coughlan v. Cambridge, 166 Mass. 268, 277; Langevin’s Case, 326 Mass. 43, 47. The record makes it clear that the employees who accomplished the repairs were lent employees, and since there was no contradictory evidence a verdict should have been directed for the defendant.

Exceptions sustained.

Judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fraco Products, Ltd. v. Bostonian Masonry Corp.
995 N.E.2d 1125 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2013)
Afonso v. City of Boston
587 F. Supp. 1342 (D. Massachusetts, 1984)
Sawtelle v. Mystic Valley Gas Co.
306 N.E.2d 271 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 N.E.2d 174, 357 Mass. 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ledbetter-v-m-b-foster-electric-co-mass-1970.