Leda Loynaz Pacific v. Peninsula Association Inc.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 18, 2026
Docket3D2025-1055
StatusPublished

This text of Leda Loynaz Pacific v. Peninsula Association Inc. (Leda Loynaz Pacific v. Peninsula Association Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leda Loynaz Pacific v. Peninsula Association Inc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed February 18, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D25-1055 Lower Tribunal No. 24-13571-CA-01 ________________

Leda Loynaz Pacific, Appellant,

vs.

Peninsula Association Inc., Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Abby Cynamon, Judge.

Leda Loynaz Pacific, in proper person.

Dania S. Fernandez & Associates, P.A., and Dania S. Fernandez, for appellee.

Before SCALES, C.J., and EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 718.303(1), Fla. Stat. (2026) (“Actions at law or in

equity, or both, for failure to comply with these provisions may be brought by

the association or by a unit owner against. . . [t]he association. . . . The

prevailing party in any such action . . . is entitled to recover reasonable

attorney fees.”); Mack v. Univ. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 321 So. 3d 901, 903

(Fla. 2d DCA 2021) (finding the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion

for attorney's fees under section 718.303(1), the attorney's fees provision of

the Condominium Act); see also Catamaran B.Y., Inc. v. Giordano, 337 So.

3d 439, 441 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“The general rule in Florida is that when a

plaintiff voluntarily dismisses an action, the defendant is the prevailing party.

It is not necessary for there to be an adjudication on the merits in order to be

entitled to fees as a prevailing party.”) (quotations omitted); Viler v. Univ.

Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 386 So. 3d 941, 943 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024) (“After entry

of a voluntary dismissal, attorney's fees can be awarded to the so-called

prevailing party under [a] statutory provision where the case was not

resolved on the merits.”); Wellness Ctr. of London Square, Inc. v. DHL

Express (USA), Inc., 393 So. 3d 752, 753 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024) (“Because

Wellness Center has not provided us a transcript of the evidentiary hearing

where the lower court addressed attorney's fees, and the face of the record

reveals no error in the court's calculation of the fee amount awarded to

2 [appellee], we must affirm the fee award.”) (quoting Myret, LLC v. Grp. LX,

Inc., 245 So. 3d 1024, 1024 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)); Applegate v. Barnett Bank

of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the

trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying

factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not

supported by the evidence or an alternate theory.”)).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Myret v. Group Lx
245 So. 3d 1024 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Leda Loynaz Pacific v. Peninsula Association Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leda-loynaz-pacific-v-peninsula-association-inc-fladistctapp-2026.