Leda Loynaz Pacific v. Peninsula Association Inc.
This text of Leda Loynaz Pacific v. Peninsula Association Inc. (Leda Loynaz Pacific v. Peninsula Association Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 18, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-1055 Lower Tribunal No. 24-13571-CA-01 ________________
Leda Loynaz Pacific, Appellant,
vs.
Peninsula Association Inc., Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Abby Cynamon, Judge.
Leda Loynaz Pacific, in proper person.
Dania S. Fernandez & Associates, P.A., and Dania S. Fernandez, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 718.303(1), Fla. Stat. (2026) (“Actions at law or in
equity, or both, for failure to comply with these provisions may be brought by
the association or by a unit owner against. . . [t]he association. . . . The
prevailing party in any such action . . . is entitled to recover reasonable
attorney fees.”); Mack v. Univ. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 321 So. 3d 901, 903
(Fla. 2d DCA 2021) (finding the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion
for attorney's fees under section 718.303(1), the attorney's fees provision of
the Condominium Act); see also Catamaran B.Y., Inc. v. Giordano, 337 So.
3d 439, 441 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“The general rule in Florida is that when a
plaintiff voluntarily dismisses an action, the defendant is the prevailing party.
It is not necessary for there to be an adjudication on the merits in order to be
entitled to fees as a prevailing party.”) (quotations omitted); Viler v. Univ.
Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 386 So. 3d 941, 943 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024) (“After entry
of a voluntary dismissal, attorney's fees can be awarded to the so-called
prevailing party under [a] statutory provision where the case was not
resolved on the merits.”); Wellness Ctr. of London Square, Inc. v. DHL
Express (USA), Inc., 393 So. 3d 752, 753 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024) (“Because
Wellness Center has not provided us a transcript of the evidentiary hearing
where the lower court addressed attorney's fees, and the face of the record
reveals no error in the court's calculation of the fee amount awarded to
2 [appellee], we must affirm the fee award.”) (quoting Myret, LLC v. Grp. LX,
Inc., 245 So. 3d 1024, 1024 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)); Applegate v. Barnett Bank
of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the
trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying
factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not
supported by the evidence or an alternate theory.”)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leda Loynaz Pacific v. Peninsula Association Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leda-loynaz-pacific-v-peninsula-association-inc-fladistctapp-2026.