Leczycki v. Kuczynski

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Leczycki v. Kuczynski

144 N.Y.S. 398

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 144 N.Y.S. 398 (Leczycki v. Kuczynski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leczycki v. Kuczynski, 144 N.Y.S. 398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff claims that by virtue of section 735 of the Code of Civil Procedure he was entitled to have included in his bill of costs the sum of $75, being fees of a witness called by him. Section 735, supra, is excluded from application to inferior co'urts by subdivision 6 of section 3347. The order is not an appealable one, and the appeal should therefore be dismissed, but without costs.

Appeal dismissed, without costs to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff claims that by virtue of section 735 of the Code of Civil Procedure he was entitled to have included in his bill of costs the sum of $75, being fees of a witness called by him. Section 735, supra, is excluded from application to inferior co'urts by subdivision 6 of section 3347. The order is not an appealable one, and the appeal should therefore be dismissed, but without costs.

Appeal dismissed, without costs to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 N.Y.S. 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leczycki-v-kuczynski-nyappterm-1913.