LeCorn v. State

528 So. 2d 538, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3074, 1988 WL 73935
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 21, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1672
StatusPublished

This text of 528 So. 2d 538 (LeCorn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LeCorn v. State, 528 So. 2d 538, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3074, 1988 WL 73935 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

LeCom’s sentence is affirmed on the authority of McKinley v. State, 519 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). This court lacks jurisdiction to consider the restitution issue.

SHARP, C.J., and ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKinley v. State
519 So. 2d 1154 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
528 So. 2d 538, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3074, 1988 WL 73935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lecorn-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.