Leco Investments, Inc. v. Meyer
This text of 275 So. 2d 31 (Leco Investments, Inc. v. Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Based upon our review of the recent case law with respect to the sufficiency of complaints and when measuring such decisions against the complaint in the instant case we are of the opinion that the allegations were such as to withstand a motion to dismiss. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Walters, Fla.1971, 246 So.2d 563; Iorio v. Layman, Fla.App.1971, 256 So.2d 26; Bond v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., Fla.App. 1971, 246 So.2d 631. See also Nantell v. Lim-Wick Construction Company, Fla.App. 1969, 228 So.2d 634.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 So. 2d 31, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leco-investments-inc-v-meyer-fladistctapp-1973.