L'Ecluse v. . Brokaw
144 N.E. 913, 238 N.Y. 611, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 794
Opinion
Appeal dismissed, with costs, on ground that the Appellate Division having unanimously reinstated the verdict leave to appeal was necessary (Burns Mfg. Co. v. Clinchfield Products Corp., 231 N. Y. 561); no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
L'Ecluse v. . Brokaw, 144 N.E. 913, 238 N.Y. 611, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 794 (N.Y. 1924).
144 N.E. 913 (L'Ecluse v. . Brokaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Markiewicz v. Thompson
158 N.E. 314 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)