LECEDRIC PRENTICE HARRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 14, 2022·No. 21-3285·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

LECEDRIC PRENTICE HARRIS, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-3285

[September 14, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562018CF001394A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Kovaleski v. State, 103 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 2012). On the issue of costs, reversal is not warranted because the State has identified costs which total the $418 imposed. Cf. Bartolone v. State, 327 So. 3d 331, 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (reversing where the “trial court did not cite to any other mandatory costs, and the State has not identified costs which would total $418”) (emphasis supplied).

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LECEDRIC PRENTICE HARRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

LECEDRIC PRENTICE HARRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (LECEDRIC PRENTICE HARRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kovaleski v. State
103 So. 3d 859 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)