Lebron v. State
Opinion
Lebrón, appellant herein and a stranger to the lease arrangement involving the victim, ordered the victim to vacate the premises while telling her that “you’re not the first ‘ho’ I ever killed and you won’t be the last” and pointing a sawed-off shotgun at her. In perhaps the most frivolous appeal to have been filed in this court, Lebrón contends his action was justified because the victim had threatened him on an earlier occasion and because she had damaged the apartment with a baseball bat. We reject Lebron’s legal position and affirm the trial court’s denial of his motion for acquittal and uphold his conviction for aggravated assault with a firearm.1
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
717 So. 2d 72 (Lebron v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.