Lebrecht v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Lebrecht v. State

1918 OK 191, 172 P. 65, 68 Okla. 108, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 302

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 9, 1918

Docket8930

StatusPublished

This text of 1918 OK 191 (Lebrecht v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lebrecht v. State, 1918 OK 191, 172 P. 65, 68 Okla. 108, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 302 (Okla. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

MILEY, J.

On January 4, 1917, A. L. Wilson, deputy sheriff of Cotton county, Okla., arrested without a warrant one Bob Lebrecht for the offense of unlawfully convoying certain intoxicating liquor, and seized the liquor and the automobile in which the same was being conveyed. Return of the seizure having been made to the county court of Cotton counity, one 'Sol Lebrecht appeared at the date fixed for hearing the return and claimed the automobile, and, among other things, alleged that seizure was wrongful and Without authority of law. Judgment was rendered January 29, 1917, adjudging the automobile forfeited to the state and ordered to deliver to the commissioners of Cotton county- to be disposed of -according to law for the benefit of the court fund of the county, to reverse which this proceeding in error is prosecuted.

Upon the authority of One Cadillac Automobile v. State of Oklahoma, 68 Okla. 116, 172 Pac. 62, this day decided, the said judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to restore the automobile to the person entitled to possession thereof.

All the Justices concur, except BRETT, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILEY, J.

On January 4, 1917, A. L. Wilson, deputy sheriff of Cotton county, Okla., arrested without a warrant one Bob Lebrecht for the offense of unlawfully convoying certain intoxicating liquor, and seized the liquor and the automobile in which the same was being conveyed. Return of the seizure having been made to the county court of Cotton counity, one 'Sol Lebrecht appeared at the date fixed for hearing the return and claimed the automobile, and, among other things, alleged that seizure was wrongful and Without authority of law. Judgment was rendered January 29, 1917, adjudging the automobile forfeited to the state and ordered to deliver to the commissioners of Cotton county- to be disposed of -according to law for the benefit of the court fund of the county, to reverse which this proceeding in error is prosecuted.

Upon the authority of One Cadillac Automobile v. State of Oklahoma, 68 Okla. 116, 172 Pac. 62, this day decided, the said judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to restore the automobile to the person entitled to possession thereof.

All the Justices concur, except BRETT, J., who dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1918 OK 191, 172 P. 65, 68 Okla. 108, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lebrecht-v-state-okla-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack