Lebovic v. Lebovic

97 A.D.2d 750, 468 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20493

Opinion

In an action for divorce, plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), entered May 12, 1983, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Special Term correctly held that the prior matrimonial judgment which dismissed plaintiff’s causes of action for divorce for failure of proof, but granted defendant custody, alimony, child support and exclusive occupancy of the marital residence, cannot serve as a predicate for a conversion divorce pursuant to subdivision (5) of section 170 of the Domestic Relations Law. “Nothing less than a judicial judgment of separation can be the basis for a divorce under the clear require[751] ments of subdivision (5) of section 170 of the Domestic Relations Law” Wechter v Wechter, 50 AD2d 826, affd 40 NY2d 964). Gibbons, J. P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lebovic v. Lebovic, 97 A.D.2d 750, 468 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20493 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

97 A.D.2d 750 (Lebovic v. Lebovic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wechter v. Wechter
359 N.E.2d 428 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Wechter v. Wechter
50 A.D.2d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)