Lebovic v. Lebovic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lebovic v. Lebovic

52 A.D.2d 918, 384 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12756

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 918 (Lebovic v. Lebovic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lebovic v. Lebovic, 52 A.D.2d 918, 384 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for divorce, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 22, 1975, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, dismissed the various causes of action and made provision for child support. Judgment modified, on the facts, without costs or disbursements, by reducing the award of child support to the sum of $25 per week for each child. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Special Term properly exercised its discretion in dismissing the action claiming cruel and inhuman treatment in connection with this 18-year marriage (cf. Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406). However, the child support award was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Latham, Acting P. J., Hargett, Damiani, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for divorce, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 22, 1975, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, dismissed the various causes of action and made provision for child support. Judgment modified, on the facts, without costs or disbursements, by reducing the award of child support to the sum of $25 per week for each child. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Special Term properly exercised its discretion in dismissing the action claiming cruel and inhuman treatment in connection with this 18-year marriage (cf. Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406). However, the child support award was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Latham, Acting P. J., Hargett, Damiani, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 918, 384 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lebovic-v-lebovic-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack