Lebolt & Co. v. Maloney

241 A.D. 98, 271 N.Y.S. 428, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8177
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 4, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 241 A.D. 98 (Lebolt & Co. v. Maloney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lebolt & Co. v. Maloney, 241 A.D. 98, 271 N.Y.S. 428, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The agreement alleged in the complaint is not within the Statute of Frauds because it involved the substitution of the liability of the defendant for the liability of his son. This constituted an original undertaking by the defendant. (Meriden Britannia Co. v. Zingsen, 48 N. Y. 247; Mallory v. Gillett, 21 id. 412.)

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O'Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Healy v. Brotman
96 Misc. 2d 386 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D. 98, 271 N.Y.S. 428, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lebolt-co-v-maloney-nyappdiv-1934.