Lebold v. Ottawa County Bank

51 Kan. 381
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided January 15, 1893·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

The only errors claimed by plaintiffs in error which they seek to have this court consider are based on the testimony introduced on the trial of the action. A case-made is attached to the petition in error, which contains no statement to the effect that it includes all the evidence, though the certificate of the trial judge who settled the case contains such a statement. Within the oft-repeated decisions of this court, this is insufficient to present the questions sought to be raised in this court. (The State, ex rel., v. Comm’rs of Harper Co., 43 [382] Kas. 195; Hill v. National Bank, 42 id. 364; Insurance Co. v. Hogue, 41 id. 524; Weaver v. Eddy, 37 id 540.)

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lebold v. Ottawa County Bank, 51 Kan. 381 (kan 1893).

51 Kan. 381 (Lebold v. Ottawa County Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wade v. Gould
1899 OK 125 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1899)
Hannon v. Holmes
47 P. 162 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1896)
Wolfert v. Milford Savings Bank
47 P. 175 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1896)
Matthewson v. Senior
42 P. 827 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1895)