LeBlanc v. Modern Flooring, Inc.
This text of 603 So. 2d 764 (LeBlanc v. Modern Flooring, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT
This matter comes before us on remand from the Supreme Court1 wherein our opinion was vacated and set aside because “[i]t appears that the remand ordered by the court of appeal would result in a reduction of plaintiffs award. This would be improper. Defendants did not appeal or answer the appeal ...”
Since a computation made as directed by our opinion, 591 So.2d 1240, would result in a reduction of benefits to plaintiff and the judgment is definitive against defendants, a remand would serve no purpose. Thus, the award for past due supplemental earnings benefits of $12,781.71 and the finding that plaintiffs average monthly wage at the time of the accident was $1,105.44 are affirmed. The denial of plaintiffs request for penalties and attorneys fees is also affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
603 So. 2d 764, 1992 La. App. LEXIS 2272, 1992 WL 155868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leblanc-v-modern-flooring-inc-lactapp-1992.