Lebkuecher v. Carr
This text of 178 A. 745 (Lebkuecher v. Carr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, dismissing the bill of complaint which sought to set aside certain conveyances of land and transfers of stock in a corporation, as fraudulent.
The vice-chancellor held that the proofs adduced by the appellants failed to sustain the cause of action set out in the bill of complaint.
*304 Appellant says that the vice-chancellor’s conclusions, which were submitted more than one year after the final hearing, contain several erroneous statements regarding the facts of the case and that the decision is predicated upon such misstatements and that the conclusions are against the weight of the evidence.
A careful consideration o'f the evidence leads us to the conclusion that there may have been one or more inaccurate statements of the facts but if so, they were of such a character as not to affect the determination of the issues involved.
We are of the opinion that the court below was fully justified in its findings of the essential facts of the case and correct in its application of the law to the facts so found, and that the decree should be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Dowges, Perskie, Yaw Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Parker, Heher, JJ. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 A. 745, 118 N.J. Eq. 303, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lebkuecher-v-carr-nj-1935.