Leberman v. Tyra Hill & Co.

1 White & W. 18
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 30, 1877
DocketNos. 391-3, Op. Book No. 1, p. 240
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 18 (Leberman v. Tyra Hill & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leberman v. Tyra Hill & Co., 1 White & W. 18 (Tex. Ct. App. 1877).

Opinion

Opinion by

White, J.

§26. Judgment, conclusiveness as to recitals in. Where the judgment recited that “ the court, having fully heard and understood the pleadings and evidence herein, it is considered,” etc., held, that the recital will be taken as conclusive against an objection urged, that the judgment was one by default, in the absence of anything appearing [19]*19in the record to support the objection or contradict the judgment recitals.

April 30, 1877.

§ 27. The maxim de minimis non curat lex applied to a claim that the judgment was excessive, where the excess was a small amount, viz.: a dollar or so.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leberman-v-tyra-hill-co-texapp-1877.