Leber v. Grosvenor

61 N.E. 759, 180 Mass. 62, 1901 Mass. LEXIS 726
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 15, 1901·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The undertaking to introduce the defendants’ goods did not mean that the plaintiffs warranted that those goods should become popular with the public and should be purchased generally. What it meant was shown by the specific agreement “to use due diligence in the introduction,” etc." It was satisfied if the goods were put on the market, brought to the attention of the public, and an effort made to induce the public to purchase them. There was evidence warranting a finding that this was done.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leber v. Grosvenor, 61 N.E. 759, 180 Mass. 62, 1901 Mass. LEXIS 726 (Mass. 1901).

61 N.E. 759 (Leber v. Grosvenor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

York County Savings Bank v. Wentworth
9 A.2d 265 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1939)
Neal v. State Ex Rel. Attorney General
21 S.W.2d 864 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1929)