Leber v. Grosvenor

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Leber v. Grosvenor

61 N.E. 759, 180 Mass. 62, 1901 Mass. LEXIS 726

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1901

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 N.E. 759 (Leber v. Grosvenor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leber v. Grosvenor, 61 N.E. 759, 180 Mass. 62, 1901 Mass. LEXIS 726 (Mass. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The undertaking to introduce the defendants’ goods did not mean that the plaintiffs warranted that those goods should become popular with the public and should be purchased generally. What it meant was shown by the specific agreement “to use due diligence in the introduction,” etc." It was satisfied if the goods were put on the market, brought to the attention of the public, and an effort made to induce the public to purchase them. There was evidence warranting a finding that this was done.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The undertaking to introduce the defendants’ goods did not mean that the plaintiffs warranted that those goods should become popular with the public and should be purchased generally. What it meant was shown by the specific agreement “to use due diligence in the introduction,” etc." It was satisfied if the goods were put on the market, brought to the attention of the public, and an effort made to induce the public to purchase them. There was evidence warranting a finding that this was done.

Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 N.E. 759, 180 Mass. 62, 1901 Mass. LEXIS 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leber-v-grosvenor-mass-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack