Lebel v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lebel v. City of New York

163 A.D.2d 920

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 13, 1990·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted, in part, plaintiff’s motion for a protective order (see, CPLR 3103 [a]; Hirschfeld v Hirschfeld, 69 NY2d 842, 844). Defendant’s notice of discovery and inspection dated May 12, 1988 was untimely under the court’s preliminary conference order dated March 25, 1986 and, in any event, defendant failed to establish that the evidence it sought was material and necessary in the defense of the action (see, CPLR 3101 [a]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Queens County, Lerner, J.—discovery.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted, in part, plaintiff’s motion for a protective order (see, CPLR 3103 [a]; Hirschfeld v Hirschfeld, 69 NY2d 842, 844). Defendant’s notice of discovery and inspection dated May 12, 1988 was untimely under the court’s preliminary conference order dated March 25, 1986 and, in any event, defendant failed to establish that the evidence it sought was material and necessary in the defense of the action (see, CPLR 3101 [a]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Queens County, Lerner, J.—discovery.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.

Lebel v. City of New York, 163 A.D.2d 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

163 A.D.2d 920 (Lebel v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related