Leavitt v. Woods

New York Supreme Court

Leavitt v. Woods

10 Wend. 558

DecidedAugust 15, 1833

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Wend. 558 (Leavitt v. Woods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leavitt v. Woods, 10 Wend. 558 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1833).

Pincite

Opinion

A notice of trial was served in this cause on 25th March, for a circuit to be held on the second Monday of June thereafter. On 16th May, the attorney for the defendant tendered to [559]*559the plaintiff’s attorney a relicta and cognovit, with a condition annexed that judgment should not be entered until the then next July term of this court. The plaintiff’s attorney refused to receive such cognovit, and at the June circuit brought the [560]*560cause to trial and obtained a verdict. On the taxation of the costs, the defendant’s attorney on the above facts objected to all the charges in the bill for proceedings at the circuit, and the taxing officer struck them out. The plaintiff moved for a retaxation, and the motion was granted by the court, Mr. Justice Sutherland presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A notice of trial was served in this cause on 25th March, for a circuit to be held on the second Monday of June thereafter. On 16th May, the attorney for the defendant tendered to [559]*559the plaintiff’s attorney a relicta and cognovit, with a condition annexed that judgment should not be entered until the then next July term of this court. The plaintiff’s attorney refused to receive such cognovit, and at the June circuit brought the [560]*560cause to trial and obtained a verdict. On the taxation of the costs, the defendant’s attorney on the above facts objected to all the charges in the bill for proceedings at the circuit, and the taxing officer struck them out. The plaintiff moved for a retaxation, and the motion was granted by the court, Mr. Justice Sutherland presiding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Wend. 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leavitt-v-woods-nysupct-1833.