Leavitt v. Locke
This text of 40 A. 395 (Leavitt v. Locke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The committee erred in ruling that they had no authority to consider the claim of the defendant, Locke, to certain buildings erected by him on the common property, and in making the division in accordance with that ruling. Ford v. Knapp, 102 N. Y. 135, 140; Crafts v. Crafts, 13 Gray 360; Holbrook v. Bowman, 62 N. H. 313, 321; Gage v. Gage, 66 N. H. 282, 288.
The defendants were not negligent in not objecting to the report of the committee before the first term at which it was returned to court. The report of the committee is set aside.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 A. 395, 68 N.H. 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leavitt-v-locke-nh-1894.