Leavitt v. Abbatangelo
This text of Leavitt v. Abbatangelo (Leavitt v. Abbatangelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
SUSAN LEAVITT, F/K/A SUSAN No. 72953 ABBATANGELO,
vs. Appellant, FILED ANTHONY L. ABBATANGELO, OCT 3 0 2017 Respondent. ELIZA.SETH A. BROWN CLERK F SUPREME COURT BY DEPUTY CLERX
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from an order imposing attorney fees and costs as sanctions in an amount to be determined for a finding of contempt, directing appellant to comply with previous court orders, and setting a hearing on a further contempt charge. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Linda Marquis, Judge. Our jurisdictional review indicated that the order was not appealable. No statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order holding a party in contempt or imposing attorney fees and costs as a sanction for contempt. In addition, the order appealed from directed further hearing on the amount of attorney fees and costs, and therefore appeared not to be final. This court issued an order to show cause directing appellant to demonstrate this court's jurisdiction. In response, appellant has filed an amended notice of appeal from the district court's order finally imposing the attorney fees and costs in an amount certain. Finalizing the amount of attorney fees and costs does not solve the fundamental jurisdictional problem. No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order that solely concerns contempt, and attorney fees and costs imposed as a sanction for contempt are not SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(01 1947A e /7 -37112. independently appealable. See Pengilly v. Rancho Santa Fe Homeowners Ass'n, 116 Nev. 646, 649, 5 P.3d 569, 671 (2000) (recognizing that a contempt order entered in an ancillary proceeding is not appealable); compare Vaile v. Vaile, 133 Nev., Adv. Op. 30, 396 P.3d 791, 794 (2017); and Lewis v. Lewis, 132 Nev., Adv. Op. 46, 373 P.3d 878, 881 (2016) (considering challenges to contempt findings and sanctions in an order that modified child custody). We lack jurisdiction, and we therefore ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Hardesty
J. Parraguirre
jekty;,..0 J. Stiglich
cc: Hon Linda Marquis, District Judge, Family Court Division Ara H Shirinian, Settlement Judge Law Offices of Kermitt L. Waters The Jimmerson Law Firm, P.0 Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
e, 2 10) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leavitt v. Abbatangelo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leavitt-v-abbatangelo-nev-2017.