Leavers v. City of Canton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Leavers v. City of Canton

29 Ohio Law Rep. 69

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 29, 1964

Docket38624

StatusPublished

This text of 29 Ohio Law Rep. 69 (Leavers v. City of Canton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leavers v. City of Canton, 29 Ohio Law Rep. 69 (Ohio Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County.

O’Neill, Judge.

An ordinance passed by a noncharter city in the exercise of its powers of local government and providing that employees of the city fire department must be retired when they reach the age of 65 years is at a variance with Section 143.27, Revised Code, and is, therefore, invalid under the provisions of Section 3, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County.

O’Neill, Judge.

An ordinance passed by a noncharter city in the exercise of its powers of local government and providing that employees of the city fire department must be retired when they reach the age of 65 years is at a variance with Section 143.27, Revised Code, and is, therefore, invalid under the provisions of Section 3, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Ohio Law Rep. 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leavers-v-city-of-canton-ohioctapp-1964.