Leavers v. City of Canton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Leavers v. City of Canton

29 Ohio Law Rep. 69

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided December 29, 1964·No. 38624·Published

Opinion

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County.

O’Neill, Judge.

An ordinance passed by a noncharter city in the exercise of its powers of local government and providing that employees of the city fire department must be retired when they reach the age of 65 years is at a variance with Section 143.27, Revised Code, and is, therefore, invalid under the provisions of Section 3, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County.

O’Neill, Judge.

An ordinance passed by a noncharter city in the exercise of its powers of local government and providing that employees of the city fire department must be retired when they reach the age of 65 years is at a variance with Section 143.27, Revised Code, and is, therefore, invalid under the provisions of Section 3, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Leavers v. City of Canton, 29 Ohio Law Rep. 69 (Ohio Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

29 Ohio Law Rep. 69 (Leavers v. City of Canton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.