Leavenworth v. Upson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Leavenworth v. Upson

4 Day 100

DecidedJune 15, 1809

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Day 100 (Leavenworth v. Upson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leavenworth v. Upson, 4 Day 100 (Colo. 1809).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

It appears from the declaration, that the plaintiff had assigned to Stephen Twining all his interest in the note; and that notice thereof had been given to the defendant previous to his receiving the discharge in question. And the plaintiff has not alié-[105]*105ged any facts, which render him liable to Twining. The defendant’s receiving this discharge, therefore, might be a fraud on Twining, but was no injury to the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

It appears from the declaration, that the plaintiff had assigned to Stephen Twining all his interest in the note; and that notice thereof had been given to the defendant previous to his receiving the discharge in question. And the plaintiff has not alié-[105]*105ged any facts, which render him liable to Twining. The defendant’s receiving this discharge, therefore, might be a fraud on Twining, but was no injury to the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Day 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leavenworth-v-upson-conn-1809.