Leavel v. Frey

66 S.E. 916, 133 Ga. 723, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 38
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1910·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

An affidavit of illegality which contained no other defense than the alleged delivery by the defendant in fi. fa. to the plaintiff of certain personal property which was alleged to be of a value equal to or greater than the amount for which the execution was issued, but which personal property was not alleged to have been delivered in payment or satisfaction of the execution, was properly dismissed upon motion of plaintiff’s counsel, as such an illegality was merely an attempt to set up an unliquidated demand against a judgment demand, and therefore presented no valid reason for arresting the progress of the fi. fa.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leavel v. Frey, 66 S.E. 916, 133 Ga. 723, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 38 (Ga. 1910).

66 S.E. 916 (Leavel v. Frey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. Jordan
195 S.E. 215 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Miles v. Swift
142 S.E. 472 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Allen v. Duval Motor Co.
136 S.E. 479 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Register v. Southern States Phosphate & Fertilizer Co.
122 S.E. 323 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Wood v. City of Rome
100 S.E. 74 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)