Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Leavel v. Frey

Leavel v. Frey

66 S.E. 916, 133 Ga. 723, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 38
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 11, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 66 S.E. 916 (Leavel v. Frey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leavel v. Frey, 66 S.E. 916, 133 Ga. 723, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 38 (Ga. 1910).

Opinion

Beck, J.

An affidavit of illegality which contained no other defense than the alleged delivery by the defendant in fi. fa. to the plaintiff of certain personal property which was alleged to be of a value equal to or greater than the amount for which the execution was issued, but which personal property was not alleged to have been delivered in payment or satisfaction of the execution, was properly dismissed upon motion of plaintiff’s counsel, as such an illegality was merely an attempt to set up an unliquidated demand against a judgment demand, and therefore presented no valid reason for arresting the progress of the fi. fa.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. Jordan
195 S.E. 215 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Miles v. Swift
142 S.E. 472 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Allen v. Duval Motor Co.
136 S.E. 479 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Register v. Southern States Phosphate & Fertilizer Co.
122 S.E. 323 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Wood v. City of Rome
100 S.E. 74 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 S.E. 916, 133 Ga. 723, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leavel-v-frey-ga-1910.