Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Leatherwood v. Royal Oaks Rentals

Leatherwood v. Royal Oaks Rentals

473 So. 2d 721, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1153, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13874
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 8, 1985
DocketNos. 84-677, 84-679
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 473 So. 2d 721 (Leatherwood v. Royal Oaks Rentals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leatherwood v. Royal Oaks Rentals, 473 So. 2d 721, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1153, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13874 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING/CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw our per curiam affirmance of December 19, 1984, and reverse the order quashing service on Royal Oaks Rentals. A motion alleging a defect in personal jurisdiction should set forth sufficient facts to demonstrate the defect in service and how the defect can be cured. See Bodden v. Young, 422 So.2d 1055, 1056 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Over 30 Association v. Blatt, 118 So.2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).

We remand for further proceedings below.

HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur. HURLEY, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCray v. Adams
529 So. 2d 1131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Carlini v. STATE, DEPT. OF LEGAL AFFAIRS
521 So. 2d 254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 So. 2d 721, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1153, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leatherwood-v-royal-oaks-rentals-fladistctapp-1985.