Leathersich v. New York State Water Resources Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Leathersich v. New York State Water Resources Commission

33 A.D.2d 714, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2870

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 714 (Leathersich v. New York State Water Resources Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leathersich v. New York State Water Resources Commission, 33 A.D.2d 714, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court.

Appeal by the petitioner from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County on October 11, 1968, which dismissed on the merits petitioner’s application for review of a determination of the respondent commission. (Opinion: 57 Mise 2d 856.) The judgment should be affirmed. Assuming that there were some errors in the receipt of evidence and that one expert witness should have been disqualified! the record nevertheless contains substantial evidence to support the determination which was not arbitrary or capricious. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court.

Appeal by the petitioner from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County on October 11, 1968, which dismissed on the merits petitioner’s application for review of a determination of the respondent commission. (Opinion: 57 Mise 2d 856.) The judgment should be affirmed. Assuming that there were some errors in the receipt of evidence and that one expert witness should have been disqualified! the record nevertheless contains substantial evidence to support the determination which was not arbitrary or capricious. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 714, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leathersich-v-new-york-state-water-resources-commission-nyappdiv-1969.