Leathers v. Raburn

79 S.E. 946, 13 Ga. App. 744, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 346
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Leathers v. Raburn. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 Ga. App. 437
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 31, 1913·No. 4803·Published

Opinion

Russell, J.

Where suit is brought in the plaintiff’s individual capacity, to recover damages for an alleged injury to property, the title to which is alleged to be in him, an amendment adding merely, after the name of the plaintiff, the words, “as administrator of” a named person, is not sufficient to state a cause of action in the plaintiff as legal representative of the estate of that person, unless it is alleged, either in the original petition or in the amendment, that the title to the property was in the person named as decedent, and that that person is in fact dead and that the plaintiff has been duly appointed and qualified as administrator upon the decedent’s estate. In the present ease the petition as amended failed to set forth a cause of action in the plaintiff as the legal representative of the person named, and it was error to overrule a demurrer raising this objection. In view of this erroneous ruling, it is unnecessary to determine any of the questions raised by the plea in abatement. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leathers v. Raburn, 79 S.E. 946, 13 Ga. App. 744, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 346 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

79 S.E. 946 (Leathers v. Raburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.