Leathers v. Furr

62 Ga. 421
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 62 Ga. 421 (Leathers v. Furr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leathers v. Furr, 62 Ga. 421 (Ga. 1879).

Opinion

Warner, Chief Justice.

This case came before the court below on a certiorari from the decision of the board of commissioners of roads and revenues of Douglas county, ordering an alleged private way to be opened on the application of Peter Leathers. On the hearing of the certiorari, the court reversed and set aside the judgment of the commissioners. Whereupon Leathers excepted.

1. Assuming that Peter Leathers was entitled to have a private way to his mill over Furr’s land, for the benefit of the mill (as to which we express no opinion), still, the evidence in the record doe3 not show that the private way which he claims, has been in constant and uninterrupted use for seven years or more, so as to give to him a prescriptive right to it, as provided by the 737th and 738th sections of the Code, [423]*423but on .the contrary, it appears from his own evidence, that he built a cow-pen across the road, and it was turned up by Gann’s house. In Short et al. vs. Walton et al., 61 Ga., 28, it was held, that to acquire a prescriptive right-of-way over the unenclosed land of another, it should have been shown that those claiming it had been in the constant and uninterrupted use of a permanent road over the land, not exceeding fifteen feet in width, and had kept it open and in repair for seven years.

2. There was no error in overruling the motion to dismiss the certiorari. The board of commissioners of roads and revenues of Douglas county is such an “ inferior judicatory ” as is contemplated by the 4052d section of the Code, and a certiora/ri may be obtained to correct the decisions thereof by petition, without first filing a bill of exceptions to the decision of that local tribunal.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toombs County
1 S.E.2d 411 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. Georgia Public-Service Commission
181 S.E. 834 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Hudson v. Sullivan
20 S.E. 77 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Ga. 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leathers-v-furr-ga-1879.