Leatherhide Industries, Inc., Debtor-Appellant v. Sidney Lieberman, Objecting Creditor-Appellee

261 F.2d 560
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Leatherhide Industries, Inc., Debtor-Appellant v. Sidney Lieberman, Objecting Creditor-Appellee. Read the opinion of the Court — 268 F.2d 206
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 20, 1958·No. 25398_1·Published

Opinion

261 F.2d 560

LEATHERHIDE INDUSTRIES, INC., Debtor-Appellant,
v.
Sidney LIEBERMAN, Objecting Creditor-Appellee.

No. 166.

Docket 25398.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued November 3 and 5, 1958.

Decided November 20, 1958.

Bernard J. Coven, New York City, for debtor-appellant.

Alfred A. Rosenberg, Brooklyn, N. Y. (Louis P. Rosenberg, Brooklyn, N. Y., on the brief), for objecting creditor-appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, WATERMAN, Circuit Judge, and GALSTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The order below dismissing this debtor's petition for reorganization on the court's determination that reorganization would be futile appears to us to be based upon an insufficient record. There are no findings — and apparently no evidence — showing the debtor's financial condition or prospects. The court should make adequate findings to support its result after taking such evidence as it deems desirable. Accordingly the order below must be reversed and the action remanded to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leatherhide Industries, Inc., Debtor-Appellant v. Sidney Lieberman, Objecting Creditor-Appellee, 261 F.2d 560 (2d Cir. 1958).

261 F.2d 560 (Leatherhide Industries, Inc., Debtor-Appellant v. Sidney Lieberman, Objecting Creditor-Appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leatherhide Industries, Inc. v. Lieberman
261 F.2d 560 (Second Circuit, 1958)