Leatherby Insurance Co. v. Matherly

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leatherby Insurance Co. v. Matherly

334 So. 2d 134, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14594

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 22, 1976

DocketNo. 76-140

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 334 So. 2d 134 (Leatherby Insurance Co. v. Matherly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leatherby Insurance Co. v. Matherly, 334 So. 2d 134, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14594 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal by defendant from an order of the circuit court granting partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs, appellees, on the issue of liability.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and have found that it discloses that there are issues of material fact which have not been eliminated by movants so as to entitle them to a partial summary.

Summary judgments are proper only where there is no genuine issue of material fact to be tried. Anderson v. Aamco Transmissions of Brevard, Inc., Fla.1972, 265 So.2d 5; Connell v. Sledge, Fla.App.1975, 306 So.2d 194.

For the reasons stated partial summary judgment should not have been granted.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI