Leatherby Insurance Co. v. Matherly

334 So. 2d 134, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14594
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 22, 1976·No. No. 76-140·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal by defendant from an order of the circuit court granting partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs, appellees, on the issue of liability.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and have found that it discloses that there are issues of material fact which have not been eliminated by movants so as to entitle them to a partial summary.

Summary judgments are proper only where there is no genuine issue of material fact to be tried. Anderson v. Aamco Transmissions of Brevard, Inc., Fla.1972, 265 So.2d 5; Connell v. Sledge, Fla.App.1975, 306 So.2d 194.

For the reasons stated partial summary judgment should not have been granted.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leatherby Insurance Co. v. Matherly, 334 So. 2d 134, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14594 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

334 So. 2d 134 (Leatherby Insurance Co. v. Matherly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beggins v. Beall & Associates Roofing Corp.
394 So. 2d 527 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)