Leath v. State
This text of 252 S.E.2d 212 (Leath v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant waived jury trial and consented to trial before the court. The judge, after hearing evidence, rendered a verdict finding the accused guilty of armed robbery. This appeal is on the general grounds only.
On cross examination of a police officer by appellant’s attorney, the officer testified that the proper Miranda warnings were given and that the appellant admitted his participation in the robbery. Another officer, upon direct examination, also testified without objection that appellant freely discussed the robbery with him and told of his participation therein. The evidence clearly supports the verdict.
"On appeals from findings of guilt, the presumption of innocence no longer prevails, the fact finders have determined the credibility of witnesses, the fact finders have been convinced beyond a reasonable doubt, and the appellate courts review the evidence only to determine if there is any evidence sufficient to authorize the fact finder to return the verdict of guilty. [Cits.]” Ridley v. State, 236 Ga. 147, 149 (223 SE2d 131); Pinkney v. State, 144 Ga. App. 768 (242 SE2d 364).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 S.E.2d 212, 148 Ga. App. 714, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leath-v-state-gactapp-1979.