Leath v. State

153 S.E. 91, 41 Ga. App. 371, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 598
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 16, 1930
Docket20333
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 153 S.E. 91 (Leath v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leath v. State, 153 S.E. 91, 41 Ga. App. 371, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 598 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Bbovles, C. J.

1. The following excerpt from the charge of the court is complained of in the amendment to the motion for a new trial: “I charge you that that presumption, as other presumptions, may be rebutted by proof. I also charge you that this would only have application where the husband and wife were residing together.” This excerpt is too fragmentary and incomplete to. raise any question for the consideration of this court. It does not show upon what presumption the court was charging.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Baker
136 S.E.2d 8 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 S.E. 91, 41 Ga. App. 371, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leath-v-state-gactapp-1930.