Leath v. State
This text of 153 S.E. 91 (Leath v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The following excerpt from the charge of the court is complained of in the amendment to the motion for a new trial: “I charge you that that presumption, as other presumptions, may be rebutted by proof. I also charge you that this would only have application where the husband and wife were residing together.” This excerpt is too fragmentary and incomplete to. raise any question for the consideration of this court. It does not show upon what presumption the court was charging.
2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 S.E. 91, 41 Ga. App. 371, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leath-v-state-gactapp-1930.