Leason v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT

243 P.3d 136, 238 Or. App. 756
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 17, 2010
Docket05CV0513ST A139477
StatusPublished

This text of 243 P.3d 136 (Leason v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leason v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 243 P.3d 136, 238 Or. App. 756 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

243 P.3d 136 (2010)
238 Or. App. 756

E.J. LEASON, aka John Leason, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Gertrude C. Leason, Plaintiff,
v.
STATE of Oregon, acting by and through the DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, Defendant-Respondent.

05CV0513ST; A139477.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted June 10, 2010.
Decided November 17, 2010.

Edward P. Fitch argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Bryant, Emerson & Fitch, LLP.

Stephanie L. Striffler, Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the briefs were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, and Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Powell v. DLCD, 238 Or.App. 678, ___ P.3d ___ (2010).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Powell v. State
243 P.3d 798 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)
Leason v. State
243 P.3d 136 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 P.3d 136, 238 Or. App. 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leason-v-state-department-of-land-conservation-and-development-orctapp-2010.