Leashley v. Rezac
7 N.E.2d 229, 132 Ohio St. 304, 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 304, 8 Ohio Op. 55, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 263
This text of 7 N.E.2d 229 (Leashley v. Rezac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Leashley v. Rezac, 7 N.E.2d 229, 132 Ohio St. 304, 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 304, 8 Ohio Op. 55, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 263 (Ohio 1937).
Opinion
It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that the overruling of the motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to file brief within the time prescribed by Rule VII of the Rules of Practice of the Courts of Appeals is not a final order or judgment from which appeal may be prosecuted.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bradford v. Micklethwaite
163 Ohio St. (N.S.) 301 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1955)
Knollwood Cemetery Co. v. Cuyahoga County
30 N.E.2d 687 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1940)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 N.E.2d 229, 132 Ohio St. 304, 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 304, 8 Ohio Op. 55, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leashley-v-rezac-ohio-1937.