Leashley v. Rezac

7 N.E.2d 229, 132 Ohio St. 304, 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 304, 8 Ohio Op. 55, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 263
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 10, 1937·No. 26396·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that the overruling of the motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to file brief within the time prescribed by Rule VII of the Rules of Practice of the Courts of Appeals is not a final order or judgment from which appeal may be prosecuted.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Zimmerman, Williams and Myers, JJ., concur, •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leashley v. Rezac, 7 N.E.2d 229, 132 Ohio St. 304, 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 304, 8 Ohio Op. 55, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 263 (Ohio 1937).

7 N.E.2d 229 (Leashley v. Rezac) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bradford v. Micklethwaite
163 Ohio St. (N.S.) 301 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1955)
Knollwood Cemetery Co. v. Cuyahoga County
30 N.E.2d 687 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1940)