Leas v. Ching
This text of Leas v. Ching (Leas v. Ching) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-18-0000325 24-APR-2018 08:15 AM
SCPW-18-0000325
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
DAVID BARTLEY LEAS, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE GALE L.F. CHING, Judge of the Family Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,
and
CRYSTAL WAITKUS LEAS, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (FC-D NO. 16-1-1014)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner David Bartley Leas’s
petition for writ of mandamus, filed on April 10, 2018, the
documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and
the record, it appears that, based on the record presented and
the current state of the family court proceedings, petitioner
fails to demonstrate that he is entitled to an extraordinary writ
to prevent irreparable and immediate harm from the family court’s
October 17, 2017 order denying the motion to disqualify counsel, and petitioner has alternative means to seek relief. See Kema v.
Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999); Wong v.
Fong, 60 Haw. 601, 604, 593 P.2d 386, 389 (1979). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of
mandamus is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 24, 2018.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leas v. Ching, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leas-v-ching-haw-2018.