Leary v. Leary

253 A.D. 790, 1 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5558
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, as a matter of discretion on the ground that the plaintiff has an adequate remedy in an action at law. (Rules Civ. Prae. rule 212; Newburger v. Lubell, 257 N. Y. 383; Mitchell v. Dunmore [791]*791Realty Co., 135 App. Div. 583; National Park Bank v. Billings, 144 id. 536; affd. on opinion below, 203 N. Y. 556.) All concur. (The order grants defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in an action for a declaratory judgment.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leary v. Leary, 253 A.D. 790, 1 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5558 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

253 A.D. 790 (Leary v. Leary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tursellino v. Paduano
202 Misc. 74 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)