Learner v. American Federation of Musicians of the United States & Canada

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Learner v. American Federation of Musicians of the United States & Canada

304 A.D.2d 370, 756 N.Y.S.2d 848, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3757

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 304 A.D.2d 370 (Learner v. American Federation of Musicians of the United States & Canada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Learner v. American Federation of Musicians of the United States & Canada, 304 A.D.2d 370, 756 N.Y.S.2d 848, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin Diamond, J.), entered February 22, 2002, which, in an action for breach of severance agreements, denied plaintiff employees’ motion for summary judgment and granted defendant employer’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly held that defendant’s former president, for whom plaintiff's worked as assistants and whose term of office was expiring, lacked apparent authority to enter into the subject severance agreements (see Arol Dev. Corp. v Whitman & Ransom, 215 AD2d 145, 146 [1995]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Ellerin, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin Diamond, J.), entered February 22, 2002, which, in an action for breach of severance agreements, denied plaintiff employees’ motion for summary judgment and granted defendant employer’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly held that defendant’s former president, for whom plaintiff's worked as assistants and whose term of office was expiring, lacked apparent authority to enter into the subject severance agreements (see Arol Dev. Corp. v Whitman & Ransom, 215 AD2d 145, 146 [1995]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Ellerin, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 A.D.2d 370, 756 N.Y.S.2d 848, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/learner-v-american-federation-of-musicians-of-the-united-states-canada-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack